Anouk Koevermans vs Federica Urgesi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When examining recent second serve performance, Urgesi has a slight edge with a 41.61% success rate compared to Koevermans' 40%.
• Urgesi demonstrates superior proficiency in winning points on their opponent's second serve, achieving 52.16%, whereas Koevermans stands at 48.57%.
• Is there a difference in first serve return abilities? It's minimal, with Urgesi at 31.53% and Koevermans at a slightly higher 31.66%.
• Under pressure, Koevermans appears slightly more resilient, saving 53.49% of breakpoints, surpassing Urgesi's 51.93%.
• In terms of overall performance over the past year, Koevermans leads with a 62.32% win rate compared to Urgesi's 55%.
• Both players have their highest win percentages on indoor hard courts, with Urgesi at 63% and Koevermans closely behind at 62%.
• Analyzing each player's experience level, Koevermans has been more successful, winning 64.62% of their matches in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, while Urgesi has won 57.41%.
• Which player has faced tougher opponents? Koevermans, with an average opponent rank of 320.65, compared to Urgesi's 417.78.
• In matches that go to a deciding set, Urgesi has a marginal advantage, winning 52% compared to Koevermans' 48%.
• Recently, Urgesi has been slightly more effective at converting breakpoints, with a success rate of 46.15% against Koevermans' 45.05%.

Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match presents an intriguing contest between two players with distinct strengths and recent performances. Urgesi shows promise in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, slightly outpacing Koevermans in these areas.

Conversely, Koevermans exhibits greater experience and overall match win percentage. Their history of facing stronger opponents positions them as a formidable contender. Additionally, while Urgesi has an edge in deciding set encounters, Koevermans demonstrates resilience under breakpoint pressure.

Considering the data, these factors suggests that Koevermans is the likely winner for this match. Their consistent performance and ability to handle diverse challenges provide them with a small but significant overall advantage over Urgesi.